Home/Insights/LinkedIn emails about half your newsletter subscribers. Measure sends and clicks, not opens

LinkedIn emails about half your newsletter subscribers. Measure sends and clicks, not opens

LinkedIn dropped the newsletter open rate in October 2026, and Email sends often run near half of subscribers. Measure send rate and clicks per 100 sends.

BY Esh, FOUNDER, ETHOS ENGINEPUBLISHED OCTOBER 24, 20267 MIN READ
KEY TAKEAWAYS
  1. Treat a LinkedIn newsletter subscriber as a candidate for an email, not a recipient. Published creator data puts sends near half of subscribers.
  2. Opens were noisy in both directions before LinkedIn removed them. Losing the subscriber-to-recipient link matters more.
  3. Track send rate and UTM-tagged clicks per 100 sends for every edition, so you can tell distribution changes from content changes.
  4. Keep time-sensitive and sequenced funnel emails on a list you own, and use each edition to move readers there.

LinkedIn stopped reporting the email open rate for newsletters in October 2026. The figure it kept, Email sends, tells a bigger story. For most creators who have published their numbers, it sits near half of the subscriber count. If a LinkedIn newsletter sits anywhere in your funnel, the subscriber number on your page is not the number of people you can reach by email.

What changed in LinkedIn newsletter analytics?

LinkedIn added two email metrics to newsletter analytics in February 2025. Email sends counts subscribers who received an email for an edition. Email open rate was the share who opened it, which LinkedIn labelled an estimate that "may not be precise."

In late September and early October 2026, creators began seeing 0% open rates. John Espirian, who escalated the issue, reported that LinkedIn first called it a problem under investigation. It then said the open rate was not reliable enough to keep and would be removed from 9 October 2026. Keir Finlow-Bates relayed the same escalation reply: opens were no longer a reliable engagement measure, and Email sends would stay wherever LinkedIn could support them.

The status is not settled. On 16 October, Espirian reported that a LinkedIn employee spoke of a long-term move from opens to clicks, and that some creators saw open data return. A LinkedIn changelog tracker still marks the scope as unconfirmed. Plan as if opens are gone, and treat any return as a bonus.

How many subscribers actually get the email?

LinkedIn has published no figure. The best evidence is creators reading their own Email sends metric against their subscriber count. It is self-reported and a small sample, but it comes from LinkedIn's own counter.

Source and dateSubscribersEmail sendsShare emailed
Keir Finlow-Bates, 6 Oct 202613,1507,37756%
Brian W. Sykes, 18 Sep 2026about 9,7005,236about 54%
Trevor Young, 8 Oct 2026over 2,8001,432 (average)51% or less
John Espirian, 10 Oct 2026about 17,000not statedaround half
Melanie Goodman, own edition, 20 Aug 2026not statednot statedabout 60%
Gina Riley, via Goodman, 20 Aug 2026not stated3,300 to 3,600about 35%

The five first-hand readings run from about half to about 60%. The 35% figure is secondhand, so give it less weight. The useful conclusion is not a precise benchmark. It is that the gap is large and varies by account, so you need your own number.

Why does LinkedIn not email every subscriber?

LinkedIn has not published how it chooses newsletter email recipients. Its engineering team has, however, described the system that governs member notifications in general, and it explains the pattern well.

LinkedIn's Air Traffic Controller, described in 2018, sits in front of almost all member notifications. It picks a channel (email, push, in-app, SMS or desktop), bundles and delays messages, and drops a notification if the member already saw the content, if it duplicates another, if it has expired, or if it would overload the member. Machine learning models score each notification by how likely the member is to act on it or to switch that notification type off. LinkedIn said this cut member complaints in half.

Earlier work set the logic. In a 2016 experiment, a group that received about half of its generated emails at random had only 2.6% fewer page views than a group that received everything. The send-everything group produced 45% more negative responses. A follow-up optimised each member's weekly mix of emails for overall activity under a complaint limit. LinkedIn's 2015 announcement said it was sending 50% fewer emails, with complaints down more than 65%.

Members also control their own inbox. Newsletter email has its own toggle in notification settings, and the unsubscribe link in a newsletter email stops the email while keeping the subscription in the feed. LinkedIn Help confirms that second point.

Our reading, which LinkedIn has not confirmed for newsletters: a subscriber is a candidate for an email, not a guaranteed recipient. The system decides per member and per edition.

Who says every subscriber gets an email?

Plenty of guides do. A January 2026 Moburst guide describes newsletter email delivery as guaranteed. Other 2026 guides say editions bypass the feed algorithm because each one reaches subscribers by email. LinkedIn's own help page says subscribers receive push, in-app and email notifications when a new edition is published.

The two positions can be reconciled. LinkedIn promises notification across channels. It does not promise an email to every subscriber for every edition. The guides read the help text as a delivery guarantee, while the Email sends metric shows what actually happened. When a vendor claim and the platform's own counter disagree, trust the counter.

A second disagreement is harder to settle. LinkedIn told Espirian that content visibility is up. Creators report the opposite, and Trevor Young saw average article views fall from about 810 to 43. Both can be true at once: overall views may rise while long-form reach falls. Without LinkedIn's data, nobody outside can resolve it.

Were opens worth keeping?

Less than it seems. Opens were noisy before LinkedIn removed them, and the noise ran in both directions.

Apple's Mail Privacy Protection downloads remote content privately in the background when a message arrives, so a tracking pixel can fire with no human open. That inflates opens. Gmail lets users choose to ask before showing external images, and a pixel that never loads deflates opens. LinkedIn's explanation, that privacy changes make opens look lower than real reading, fits the second case and not the first. beehiiv's 2026 report, based on its own platform's 28 billion emails sent in 2025, describes the industry moving toward verified clicks and replies for the same reason. For more on why clicks need cleaning too, see bot clicks in email.

Article views are not a fair substitute either. Views mix email readers with feed and search readers. Finlow-Bates logged 133 views from notifications on 7,377 sends, about 1.8 per 100. Sykes logged 1,900 views on 5,236 sends, about 36 per 100. A ratio that varies twentyfold between accounts cannot stand in for an email metric.

What you really lost is the link between subscribers and recipients. That is fixable.

What should you measure instead?

Two numbers, both per edition.

  1. Send rate = Email sends ÷ subscribers on publish day.
  2. Clicks per 100 sends = sessions from UTM-tagged links ÷ Email sends × 100.

Send rate tells you how much of your audience LinkedIn chose to email. Clicks per 100 sends tells you how well the edition worked for the people who got it. Splitting them stops you from blaming your content for a distribution change.

A hypothetical example shows why. A B2B newsletter has 12,000 subscribers. LinkedIn emails 6,000 of them, a 50% send rate, and tagged links bring 48 sessions. That is 0.8 per 100 sends, or 0.4 per 100 subscribers. Next month the list grows to 12,400, but LinkedIn emails only 4,340, a 35% send rate. Tagged sessions fall to 35.

Measured per subscriber, performance dropped from 0.40 to 0.28 per 100, a fall of about 30%. A team would rewrite the content. Measured per send, it held at 0.8 per 100. The content did its job. LinkedIn simply emailed fewer people. The right response is to move more readers to a channel you control, not to change the writing.

Use Google Analytics' required UTM fields: utm_source, utm_medium and utm_campaign. Add utm_content to tell links in one edition apart. Values are case sensitive, so pick lowercase and stick to it, or the same newsletter splits into several rows.

Which funnel jobs can a LinkedIn newsletter carry?

Funnel jobLinkedIn newsletterList you ownReason
Reaching new readersStrongWeakFollow prompts invite new followers to subscribe
Growing an audience you can later emailUse as a bridgeDestinationLinkedIn subscribers cannot be exported
Webinar or event invitesWeakUse thisYou cannot see who was emailed or when
Product launches and deadlinesWeakUse thisYou cannot reach the subscribers LinkedIn skipped
Nurture sequencesNot possibleUse thisNo sequencing, segments or per-contact history
Proving content reaches pipelinePartialUse thisClicks are visible only through your own UTM tags

The bridge row is the one most teams skip. Every edition should carry one clear offer that moves a reader onto your own list, such as a checklist or a template. Whether to gate that asset is a separate call; gate the guide or leave it open gives a break-even test. For webinar promotion, where who received the invite matters, see what webinar no-shows are worth.

A seven-step check for your next four editions

  1. Record subscribers on publish day. Screenshot the count, so each edition has a fixed denominator.
  2. Record Email sends after seven days. Compute send rate for each edition.
  3. Tag every link. Use utm_source=linkedin, utm_medium=newsletter, a utm_campaign per edition and a utm_content per link position.
  4. Count sessions and key events per 100 sends. Use your own analytics, not LinkedIn views.
  5. Add one owned-list offer per edition. Count sign-ups per 100 sends.
  6. Read the two trends together. Falling send rate with steady clicks per send means distribution moved. Steady send rate with falling clicks per send means the content or offer weakened.
  7. Decide after four editions. Keep the newsletter for the jobs in the table where it is strong, and move the rest to your list.

The underlying lesson goes beyond LinkedIn. Any channel that decides who receives your message is rented reach. Count it at the point of delivery, and keep the audience you need to reach on a channel you control. If you want a measured view of where your brand shows up, from inboxes to AI answers, join the Ethos Engine waitlist.

Questions

Does every LinkedIn newsletter subscriber get an email for each edition?

No. LinkedIn's help pages say subscribers get push, in-app and email notifications, but the Email sends figure in newsletter analytics is usually well below the subscriber count. Creators who published their figures between August and October 2026 saw roughly half to 60% of subscribers emailed. A secondhand report puts one account near 35%.

Why did LinkedIn remove the newsletter open rate?

According to creators who escalated the issue, LinkedIn said opens were no longer a reliable measure of engagement and blamed email privacy changes. Removal was reported from 9 October 2026. A LinkedIn employee later said the long-term plan is to move from opens to clicks, and some creators saw open data return, so the status is still unsettled.

What should I measure instead of LinkedIn newsletter opens?

Measure two things. Send rate is Email sends divided by subscribers on publish day. Clicks per 100 sends comes from UTM-tagged links counted in your own analytics. Together they separate a distribution problem, where LinkedIn emails fewer people, from a content problem, where the people emailed stop clicking.

Should I stop publishing a LinkedIn newsletter?

Not by default. It still grows subscribers through follow prompts and reaches people outside your list. Use it for discovery and for moving readers to a list you own. Do not rely on it for webinar invites, launches or nurture sequences, where you need to know who received the message.

Sources

  1. John Espirian, LinkedIn newsletter visibility espirian.co.uk
  2. John Espirian, Informed 505 espirian.co.uk
  3. John Espirian, Informed 506 espirian.co.uk
  4. Keir Finlow-Bates, Just When You Think LinkedIn Can't Get Any Worse blockchaingandalf.substack.com
  5. Trevor Young, My LinkedIn newsletter views tanked 95% in a week earntheright.substack.com
  6. Brian W. Sykes, LinkedIn Newsletter, What's Happening Behind the Curtain theailab.substack.com
  7. Melanie Goodman, LinkedIn Newsletters in 2026, What I Learned From Studying the 50 Biggest melaniegoodmanlinkedinconsultant.substack.com
  8. Leaders Social, LinkedIn Updates and Change Log leaders.social
  9. LinkedIn Help, Newsletters on LinkedIn FAQ linkedin.com
  10. LinkedIn Help, LinkedIn Newsletters linkedin.com
  11. LinkedIn Engineering, Air Traffic Controller, Member-First Notifications at LinkedIn engineering.linkedin.com
  12. LinkedIn Engineering, Less Is More, Optimizing Email Volume Part 1 engineering.linkedin.com
  13. LinkedIn Engineering, Less Is More, Optimizing Email Volume Part 2 engineering.linkedin.com
  14. LinkedIn Official Blog, Sending less email is just the beginning blog.linkedin.com
  15. Social Media Today, LinkedIn Rolls Out New Newsletter Metrics socialmediatoday.com
  16. Search Engine Journal, LinkedIn Rolls Out Email Metrics For Newsletter Publishers searchenginejournal.com
  17. Apple Support, Protect email privacy in Mail on Mac support.apple.com
  18. Google Support, Turn images on or off in Gmail support.google.com
  19. beehiiv, The State of Newsletters 2026 beehiiv.com
  20. Google Analytics Help, URL builders, Collect campaign data with custom URLs support.google.com
  21. Moburst, Master LinkedIn Newsletter Strategies For Growth in 2026 moburst.com
  22. Guideflow, How to turn off email newsletters notifications on LinkedIn guideflow.com
E
Esh

Founder, Ethos Engine. Builds the Digital Authority Score and runs the placement marketplace. esh@ethosengine.io

NEXT STEP

See where your brand stands.

Your Digital Authority Score, who AI recommends for your target questions, and the placements that close each gap. Your first report is free.

Get your free report →
MOREINSIGHTS